Reports of Trade Mark Cases for CIPA January 2020
Contacts
In this month's report, we look at the relevance of disclaimers when assessing likelihood of confusion in Patent- och registreringsverket v Mats Hansson (Case C-705/17). We also look at criminal sanctions for the unauthorised use of a registered trade mark under Section 92(1) of the Trade Marks Act in R v James Clements ([2019] EWCA Crim 2253)
Latest insights
More Insights
Australia Moves to Introduce Orphan Works Copyright Scheme: What It Means for Creative Industries and AI Training
3 minutes Dec 09 2025
Skinny labels ≠ safe harbor: evolving liability for second medical use patents in Germany
6 minutes Dec 02 2025
New Judicial Interpretation from the Supreme People’s Court of China: Clarification of Role of Patent Evaluation Reports in Utility Model or Design Patent Infringement
4 minutes Dec 02 2025