Lessons learned from the BIG MAC: how to prevent trademark revocation for non-use
Contacts
Associate
Italy
Here at Bird & Bird, I am a senior associate in our Intellectual Property Group in Milan with experience across the food and beverage, luxury, fashion and design sectors.
Counsel
Italy
As Counsel here at Bird & Bird, I have broad experience in Italian and European IP law, representing our clients from industries including food, fashion, entertainment, media, retail, finance and insurance, in trade mark, copyright and design matters.
The EUIPO Cancellation Division (the “Division”) ruled against the owner’s BIG MAC trademark registration, stating it should be revoked for non-use. This outcome was surprising given the BIG MAC burger is one of the most popular and well-known products in the fast-food market. On 14 December 2022,the EUIPO board of appeal(the “Board”) departed from the ruling granting revocation on the basis of non-use by partially upholding the appeal filed by the owner.
Latest insights
More Insights
Australia Moves to Introduce Orphan Works Copyright Scheme: What It Means for Creative Industries and AI Training
3 minutes Dec 09 2025
China Cybersecurity and Data Protection: Monthly Update – November 2025 Issue
20 minutes Dec 09 2025
Skinny labels ≠ safe harbor: evolving liability for second medical use patents in Germany
6 minutes Dec 02 2025