Lessons learned from the BIG MAC: how to prevent trademark revocation for non-use

Written By

francesca rombola Module
Francesca Rombola

Associate
Italy

Here at Bird & Bird, I am a senior associate in our Intellectual Property Group in Milan with experience across the food and beverage, luxury, fashion and design sectors.

paola ruggiero Module
Paola Ruggiero

Counsel
Italy

As Counsel here at Bird & Bird, I have broad experience in Italian and European IP law, representing our clients from industries including food, fashion, entertainment, media, retail, finance and insurance, in trade mark, copyright and design matters.

The EUIPO Cancellation Division (the “Division”) ruled against the owner’s BIG MAC trademark registration, stating it should be revoked for non-use. This outcome was surprising given the BIG MAC burger is one of the most popular and well-known products in the fast-food market. On 14 December 2022,the EUIPO board of appeal(the “Board”) departed from the ruling granting revocation on the basis of non-use by partially upholding the appeal filed by the owner.

Latest insights

More Insights
featured image

UK Court of Appeal reaffirms no UK SPC for second medical use

4 minutes May 14 2025

Read More
Curiosity line blue background

Similar, or not similar, that is the question: Thoughts and Takeaways on Singapore’s Marks-Similarity assessment

May 14 2025

Read More
featured image

CPR on the EU Draft SEP Regulation?

2 minutes May 12 2025

Read More