The Government’s Employment Rights Bill (the “Bill”) and the accompanying Next Steps policy paper (published on 10 October 2024) set out a vast framework of enhanced worker rights. There will be a lot for retail employers to get to grips with – there are 28 individual reforms in the Bill alone. However, much of the Bill contains placeholders, with some of the most important terms left for consultation and future legislation or regulations.
Therefore, there will be some breathing space before the changes happen on the ground. Consultation on much of the reforms will take place in 2025 and the majority of the changes will not come into effect before 2026. In particular, certainty about the earliest date (Autumn 2026) for introducing the day 1 right to unfair dismissal protection will be welcome to many employers.
Highlighted below are several key aspects of the Bill that retail employers will need to navigate:
For a full summary of all the reforms in the Bill and Next Steps paper, please review our latest news flash. There is nothing immediate for employers to do now, as the Bill may change as it passes through Parliament before becoming law at some future point.
There have been a number of recent high profile cases involving retailers:
i. Equal pay for equal value work: an Employment Tribunal (“ET”) recently ruled that Next breached equal pay law by compensating predominantly male warehouse staff at a higher rate than predominantly female shop-floor sales staff, despite the two groups performing work of equal value. Next’s justification for the difference in pay centred around cost-cutting. It sought to rely on various “material factors” such as market forces, market price, recruitment difficulties, and the performance of the company and its subsidiaries, to justify the pay disparity. However, the ET dismissed these arguments, ruling that these factors were indirectly discriminatory and could not be justified. This is an important decision. Whilst not binding on other Tribunals, it is likely to be significant considering the number of similar on-going equal pay cases being made against other UK retailers. It demonstrates that retail employers may face difficulties in justifying pay differences on the basis of market forces alone. Ms M Thandi and Others v Next Retail Limited and Next Distribution Ltd: 1302019/2018 and Others (LINK)
ii. Fire and Rehire: the Supreme Court (“SC”) upheld an injunction preventing Tesco from firing employees with the intention of removing or diminishing a “retained pay” arrangement and re-hiring them with lower pay. The case specifics are unique, and its wider impact remains to be seen, but it serves as a warning that the practice of 'fire and rehire' may not be a simple solution for removing costly contractual benefits, particularly if they are expressly stated to be permanent. The Government has kept to its pledge to restrict the use of 'fire and rehire' in its Employment Rights Bill, and employers' ability to change terms and conditions through this method are highly likely to be extremely limited in the coming months. Tesco Stores Ltd (Respondent) v Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers and others (Appellants) [2024] UKSC 28 (LINK).
Lastly, a reminder that from 26 October 2024, all employers (regardless of size) have a proactive and mandatory duty to take reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment of their employees. The duty requires employers to take a proactive approach to anticipate the risks of sexual harassment happening in the workplace (not just by co-workers but also by third parties, such as customers and members of the public) and to implement preventative measures. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (“EHRC”) has published updated technical guidance to help employers navigate the new duty.
An employee cannot bring a claim for breach of the new duty. However, if an employee succeeds in a sexual harassment claim, the employment tribunal will have power to increase any harassment compensation by up to 25% if an employer has failed to comply with the duty, potentially leading to substantial financial and reputational consequences for non-compliance. The EHRC will also have enforcement powers where they consider the new duty has been breached.
Complying with the duty involves: