Reports of Trade Mark Cases for CIPA November 2020

In this month’s report, we look at the High Court’s decision in Sazerac Brands, LLC & Anr v Liverpool Gin Distillery Ltd & Anr [2020] EWHC 2424 (Ch), where Fancourt J rules on the likelihood of confusion and unfair advantage relating to a premium product. We also report on the distinctiveness of signs applied to specific goods in Aktiebolaget Östgötatrafiken v Patent- och registreringsverket (CJ; C 456/19) and summarise the findings on the likelihood of confusion in Decathlon v EUIPO; Athlon Custom Sportswear PC (T-349/19).

Latest insights

More Insights
featured image

Australia Moves to Introduce Orphan Works Copyright Scheme: What It Means for Creative Industries and AI Training

3 minutes Dec 09 2025

Read More
featured image

Skinny labels ≠ safe harbor: evolving liability for second medical use patents in Germany

6 minutes Dec 02 2025

Read More
Curiosity line green background

New Judicial Interpretation from the Supreme People’s Court of China: Clarification of Role of Patent Evaluation Reports in Utility Model or Design Patent Infringement

4 minutes Dec 02 2025

Read More