Reports of Trade Mark Cases for CIPA November 2020

In this month’s report, we look at the High Court’s decision in Sazerac Brands, LLC & Anr v Liverpool Gin Distillery Ltd & Anr [2020] EWHC 2424 (Ch), where Fancourt J rules on the likelihood of confusion and unfair advantage relating to a premium product. We also report on the distinctiveness of signs applied to specific goods in Aktiebolaget Östgötatrafiken v Patent- och registreringsverket (CJ; C 456/19) and summarise the findings on the likelihood of confusion in Decathlon v EUIPO; Athlon Custom Sportswear PC (T-349/19).

Latest insights

More Insights
featured image

Key Takeaways from LES Seminar: Licensing Negotiation Groups (LNGs) in Standard Essential Patent Licensing

3 minutes Oct 06 2025

Read More
featured image

Patent Litigation in Practice Series: Spotlight on the Czech Republic – Preliminary Injunctions

5 minutes Sep 30 2025

Read More
featured image

What are Technically Qualified Judges at the Unified Patent Court?

2 minutes Sep 25 2025

Read More