Reports of Trade Mark Cases for CIPA November 2020

In this month’s report, we look at the High Court’s decision in Sazerac Brands, LLC & Anr v Liverpool Gin Distillery Ltd & Anr [2020] EWHC 2424 (Ch), where Fancourt J rules on the likelihood of confusion and unfair advantage relating to a premium product. We also report on the distinctiveness of signs applied to specific goods in Aktiebolaget Östgötatrafiken v Patent- och registreringsverket (CJ; C 456/19) and summarise the findings on the likelihood of confusion in Decathlon v EUIPO; Athlon Custom Sportswear PC (T-349/19).

Latest insights

More Insights
yellow copyright symbol on blue background

Poland: The DSM Directive finally implemented

Sep 19 2024

Read More
spring

How to better preserve use evidence for registered trademarks in China?

Sep 18 2024

Read More
featured image

Embracing AI & Wellness – Where does the buck stop when AI goes wrong?

4 minutes Sep 04 2024

Read More