Reports of Trade Mark Cases for CIPA November 2020

In this month’s report, we look at the High Court’s decision in Sazerac Brands, LLC & Anr v Liverpool Gin Distillery Ltd & Anr [2020] EWHC 2424 (Ch), where Fancourt J rules on the likelihood of confusion and unfair advantage relating to a premium product. We also report on the distinctiveness of signs applied to specific goods in Aktiebolaget Östgötatrafiken v Patent- och registreringsverket (CJ; C 456/19) and summarise the findings on the likelihood of confusion in Decathlon v EUIPO; Athlon Custom Sportswear PC (T-349/19).

Latest insights

More Insights
DNA blocks

International Comparative Legal Guide - Digital Health 2025

Mar 06 2025

Read More
HR Data Essentials image

Report of Trade Mark Cases For the CIPA Journal February 2025

Mar 05 2025

Read More
featured image

Can you make changes to your case before the UPC?

3 minutes Mar 03 2025

Read More