Reports of Trade Mark Cases for CIPA November 2020

In this month’s report, we look at the High Court’s decision in Sazerac Brands, LLC & Anr v Liverpool Gin Distillery Ltd & Anr [2020] EWHC 2424 (Ch), where Fancourt J rules on the likelihood of confusion and unfair advantage relating to a premium product. We also report on the distinctiveness of signs applied to specific goods in Aktiebolaget Östgötatrafiken v Patent- och registreringsverket (CJ; C 456/19) and summarise the findings on the likelihood of confusion in Decathlon v EUIPO; Athlon Custom Sportswear PC (T-349/19).

Latest insights

More Insights
featured image

UK Court of Appeal overturns refusal of interim injunction against generic companies

6 minutes Jun 26 2025

Read More
featured image

Patent litigation in Practice Series: How the Finnish principle of openness in governmental activities affects patent enforcement measures

5 minutes Jun 24 2025

Read More
featured image

Enforcement securities at the UPC - an exception not the rule

2 minutes Jun 24 2025

Read More