This status update informs about how the Nordic countries Sweden, Finland, and Denmark are implementing the NIS2 Directive. All countries have chosen a minimalistic approach, closely following the directive’s baseline requirements without adding significant national-specific obligations. Some details can however be specified through secondary legislation at ordinance and agency regulation level.
Denmark and Finland have existing legislation which companies in scope need to comply with. Sweden is expected to have similar legislation in January 2026.
Country | Status of the implementation |
Denmark | In Denmark, the NIS2 has been implemented in sector specific regulation for Energy, Telco, and financial services and then for all other industries in a NIS2 framework regulation. NIS2 Energy Act entered into force 7 March 2025, and the remaining NIS2 regulation (NIS2 Telco) and the general NIS2 Act entered into force 1 July 2025. |
Finland | In Finland, the NIS2 implementing legislation, notably the new Cybersecurity Act (124/2025) (“Finnish Act”), entered into force on 8 April 2025. In the public sector, the NIS2 has been implemented in the Act on Information Management in Public Administration (906/2019). |
Sweden | In Sweden, the government presented its final bill on 14 October 2025 A vote on the bill is expected in December 2025. According to the current proposed bill, the new Swedish Cybersecurity Act (the “Swedish Act”) will enter into force on 15 January 2026. |
The registration deadlines have passed in Denmark and Finland. In Sweden, the registration needs to be done as soon as possible once the Swedish Act has been passed.
Country | Registration deadline |
Denmark | In Denmark, the registration deadline was 1 October 2025, and hereafter changes or new additions have 2 weeks to register following changes or becoming in scope. |
Finland | In Finland, the registration deadline was on 8 May 2025. For those entities that were not in scope when the Finnish Act entered into force, the registration must be done within one month after the entity becomes subject to the Finnish Act. Changes to the information must be reported within 2 weeks or 3 months, depending on the information. |
Sweden | In Sweden, the proposal does not specify a fixed deadline for registration of the entities under the NIS2 framework. Instead, it states only that registration must be completed as soon as possible, which essentially requires entities to be prepared to act promptly once the law takes effect on 15 January 2026. Any changes to registration details must be reported within 14 days. Entities affected by the Swedish Act should closely monitor the legislative process and prepare their registration information in advance. |
In Finland, there are seven sector-specific authorities which supervise the entities and may issue technical orders on certain aspects of the risk management measures and the reporting of incidents and cyber threats within their area of competence.
Denmark implemented a hybrid approach regarding supervision: Apart from the centralised authority, SAMSIK, there are a number of sector specific regulators depending on the specific scope/industry.
Denmark has implemented a sector specific approach to regulators, and as there is one centralised authority, SAMSIK, there are also a number of sector specific regulators depending on the specific scope/industry, which the entity falls under NIS2 with reference to.
When the Swedish Act enters into force, the Government will issue a regulation specifying, amongst other things, which authorities will act as supervisory authorities, and which will be mandated to issue secondary legislation where the Swedish Act provides for such a possibility. The Government has already issued in September decisions assigning regulatory tasks to the Swedish Civil Contingency Agency and Swedish Post and Telecom Authority. The former must be able to issue regulations applicable to all sectors covering:
Similarly, the Government has instructed PTS (the Swedish Post and Telecom Authority) to be able to issue secondary legislation for the telco sector covering security measures and guidance on what constitutes a significant incident as well as further information on the information obligations regarding significant incidents and significant cyber threats.
Both authorities are working on the new regulations, with consultations expected in late 2025 or early 2026. Following entry into force of the Swedish Act and ordinance, the issued secondary legislation will replace the existing NIS regulations.
Entities must implement appropriate and proportionate technical, operational and organisational measures to protect their networks, systems and physical environment. These measures must follow an all-risk approach and cover at minimum the measures required by the NIS2.
In Finland, entities had to have the risk management approach in place by 8 July 2025. For those entities that were not in scope of the Finnish Act when it entered into force, the risk management approach must be in place within 3 months after the entity becomes subject to the Finnish Act. No such grace period is provided in Denmark or Sweden. This might mean that in Sweden, entities must be compliant with all obligations once the Swedish Act enters into force on 15 January 2026. For Denmark, entities already must have been compliant since 1 July 2025.
In all three Nordic countries, the deadlines for incident notifications are broadly speaking in line with the deadlines in the directive. One exception is Sweden, where providers of trusted services must submit the follow-up notification earlier than required by the NIS2, already within 24 hours from awareness of an incident.
Supervisory authorities can order remediation, impose administrative fines, or issue remarks; maximum fines mirror NIS2. In Finland, administrative fines cannot be imposed on entities of public administration. In Sweden, it is possible to impose administrative fines on both private and public entities; management body members of essential entities may in certain situations be subject to a prohibition limited in time on holding management functions. In Denmark it is not possible to impose administrative fines, but any sanctions must follow the regular processes under the public prosecution authority. In Denmark, the management body personal liability has not been included as part of the transposition.
In Finland, the entities should ensure that they have registered with the relevant supervisory authority and have the risk management approach in place, as well as have the reporting workflows set up to be able to meet the tight reporting deadlines.
Denmark is at a similar stage as Finland as a fully implemented member state. Full compliance of all measures must be implemented already now.
In Sweden, entities that may fall within the scope of the Swedish Act should:
For more information on the Cybersecurity visit:
Our Cybersecurity Hub here: Cybersecurity - Bird & Bird
& NIS2 Tracker here: NISD 2 Tracker - Bird & Bird.