The German Accessibility Strengthening Act (“Barrierefreiheitsstärkungsgesetz”, or “BFSG”) will take effect on 28 June 2025. It implements the accessibility requirements of Directive (EU) 2019/882 (“European Accessibility Act”, or “EAA”).
The BFSG is complemented by the Ordinance on the Accessibility Strengthening Act (“Verordnung zum Barrieferefreiheitsstärkungsgesetz”, “BFSGV”) of 22 June 2022, which defines specific accessibility requirements for the products and services covered by the BFSG.
These new laws apply to economic operators offering or participating in the provision of certain goods and services to consumers in Germany. Affected companies must ensure that their products and services can be used by individuals with visual, auditory, motor or cognitive impairments without particular difficulty, and without the need for third-party assistance, in principle. In the public sector, pre-existing German accessibility laws continue in force and effect (BGG/BITV 2.0).
This article provides practical guidance on the scope of the German EAA implementation law, key compliance obligations and technical standards that companies should adhere to in order to avoid legal risks. For an overview of the broader European context, please refer to Bird & Bird’s previous article here: European Accessibility Act: is it time to update your websites, products & services to meet Europe’s accessibility requirements?
The products covered under the BFSG are listed exhaustively in Section 1 (2) BFSG:
The services covered under the BFSG are listed exhaustively in Section 1 (3) BFSG:
Section 1 (4) BFSG exempts the following content of websites and mobile applications from the scope of the new law:
In addition, the BFSG provides two exemptions to compliance with the accessibility obligations. An economic operator may be exempt if:
A 'fundamental change' may mean that meeting accessibility criteria would significantly alter the product or service, preventing it from serving its original purpose.
Whether a requirement imposes a disproportionate burden necessitates a thorough, documented, individual evaluation considering the criteria listed in Annex 4 of the BFSG. Essentially, this involves carefully weighing up the interests involved, taking into account, inter alia, the economic operator’s compliance costs, as well as the total costs (operating and investment expenditure) of manufacturing, distributing or importing the product or providing the service, and the benefits for people with disabilities.
Because detailed guidance is currently unavailable, the requirements and thresholds for applying these exceptions remain uncertain. However, businesses should expect courts and public bodies to interpret these exemptions rather conservatively.
The BFSG establishes obligations for all economic operators whose services or products fall within the scope of the BFSG. Section 2 no. 15 BFSG defines economic operators as manufacturers and their authorised representatives, importers, distributors, as well as service providers.
The BFSG does not apply to small-sized enterprises, meaning enterprises which employ fewer than 10 persons, and which have an annual turnover not exceeding EUR 2 million, or an annual balance sheet total not exceeding EUR 2 million (Section 3 (3) BFSG).
The BFSG will come into effect on 28 June 2025. It will apply to relevant products placed on the Union market for the first time after this date, i.e. from 29 June 2025 onwards, and to relevant services provided to consumers after this date.
Section 38 of the BFSG provides for a transitional period in the following cases:
The Barrierefreie-Informationstechnik-Verordnung (“BITV 2.0”) is part of Germany’s Disability Equality Act (the “BGG”). BGG and BITV 2.0 implement the digital accessibility directive for public bodies (Directive (EU) 2016/2102) and remain the primary legal framework applicable to federal public sector bodies. In addition, each Federal State in Germany has accessibility laws governing the public sector bodies of their respective federal state.
According to Section 3 (1) BFSG, relevant products and services must be made “findable, accessible and usable” for people with disabilities “in a generally usual manner, without particular difficulty and, in principle, without external help”.
This does require, inter alia, adhering to a two-sense principle, with content presented in an understandable way and in a font of an appropriate size, in a suitable typeface and contrast, and in a way that users can perceive. For each form of presentation used (e.g. in the form of text, images, videos, audio) an alternative should be offered so that people who cannot perceive this form of presentation or can only poorly perceive this form of presentation due to a disability can also access the information.
Like the EAA, the BFSG only sets out abstract accessibility requirements. More specific implementation requirements are set out under the BFSGV; for e-commerce services (such as web shops) in Sections 3, 12, 13, 19, 20, 21 of the BFSGV.
For instance, Section 12 BFSGV regulates that websites and services offered on mobile devices (including mobile apps) must be designed in consistency with the following principles:
(a) Perceivability: Information and user interface components must be presented in ways users can perceive, including by deaf or blind people or people with visual impairments or colour blindness.
(b) Usability: The user must be able to handle the components of the user interface and the navigation.
(c) Understandability: The information and the user interface must be understandable, including by way of using understandable language.
(d) Robustness: The content must be sufficiently robust to be reliably interpreted by a variety of user agents, including assistive technologies.
Generally, an alternative should be offered for each of the forms of presentation (e.g. text, images, videos or audio) on a website, so that people who are unable to perceive a form of presentation, or can only do so poorly, due to a disability, can access the information displayed (e.g. subtitles for videos or a textual description of images).
Displaying text appropriately (by using different font size, sufficient contrast and spacing between letters, lines and paragraphs, spacing etc.) may likewise be necessary.
Information provided in text formats must be suitable for consumers to generate alternative assistive formats that can be displayed in different ways and perceived through more than one sensory channel.
In relation to products or services with certain modes of operation (e.g. visual or voice input to navigate the user interface), Section 21 BFSGV prescribes the necessary mandatory alternative modes of operation to overcome relevant disabilities (so-called functional performance criteria).
Against the background of the complex legal framework under the BFSG and BFSGV, it is recommendable to rely on internationally recognised norms or technical specifications when implementing accessibility requirements such as the European harmonised norm EN 301 549, the latest version of European Union’s current harmonised digital accessibility standard which integrates the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 in its entirety. EN 304 549 will be updated to refer to WCAG 2.2, the successor version of WCAG 2.1.
In Germany, the Federal Agency for Accessibility is mandated to publish practical guidance on the technical implementation of the BFSG on its website (Bundesfachstelle Barrierefreiheit - Startseite). They have published Guidelines for the application of the Accessibility Act and a series of webinar guidance, available here. The German Ministry for Labor and Social Affairs also provides guidelines for the implementation of BFSG available here.
In addition to the technical implementation requirements, the BFSG also foresees information obligations for economic operators. For instance, Section 14 BFSG in conjunction with its Appendix 3) requires service providers to provide the following information to consumers:
Other economic operators such as manufacturers are subject to information and labelling obligations which are set out, inter alia, in Section 7 and 10 BFSG.
The information obligations can typically be fulfilled by providing a so-called accessibility statement via a hyperlink on the website footer or in relevant terms and conditions. The EU legislator published a Model Accessibility Statement which may serve as initial guidance. However, it is important to note that this is made available for public bodies which are subject to stricter and more extensive information obligations under Directive (EU) 2016/2102.
Violations of the accessibility requirements can constitute an administrative offense pursuant to Section 37 (2) BFSG and can result in administrative fines of up to EUR 100,000, in less severe cases the maximum fine is up to EUR 10,000. Additionally, cease-and-desist-actions by consumer protection associations or competitors may be possible.
In conclusion, the BFSG signals a broader shift towards digital inclusion and consumer-centric design in the German market. With the deadline approaching, businesses are well advised to review their products and services against the requirements of German accessibility laws.
Authors: Henriette Picot, Gökhan Kosak and Viktoria Knippenberg.