Alright, Alright, Alright: Matthew McConaughey Secures Comprehensive Trade Mark Protection of His Persona to Combat AI Deepfakes

Contacts

ann henry Module
Ann Henry

Partner
Ireland

I am a partner based in our Dublin office. I have been ranked as a "Leading Individual" in Dispute Resolution in Ireland for many years. Legal 500 2022 noted that I am recognised particularly for my role in a number of major patent disputes and data breach cases.

anne sophie lampe Module
Anne-Sophie Lampe

Partner
France

I am a partner based in our Paris office, with over 15 years of experience as a technology lawyer. I specialise in IT and Internet transactional and dispute matters, representing both tech companies and end-user clients across a broad range of issues.

Matthew McConaughey has joined a growing number of celebrities and sports figures in protecting characteristic features of their persona. Through his company, J.K. Livin Brands Inc., the Oscar-winning actor obtained eight trade marks in Classes 9 (Electrical & Scientific Apparatus) and 41 (Education & Entertainment) from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office covering his voice, image and signature phrases, creating a nationwide legal shield against unauthorised artificial intelligence (“AI”) exploitation, particularly deepfakes. 

The registrations include motion marks featuring McConaughey’s distinctive gestures, including a 7-second porch scene[1] and a 3-second clip of him in front of a Christmas tree[2]. Additional sound marks protect the unique pitch and delivery of his iconic “Alright, Alright, Alright[3], and "Just keep livin', right? I mean, what else are we gonna do?"[4].

Building on Existing Practice

While celebrities increasingly seek protection for distinctive traits such as poses, gestures, and catchphrases, McConaughey’s filings stand out for their breadth, covering multiple aspects of his persona with the stated aim of combatting AI exploitation.

Whilst US state-level publicity rights already safeguard against commercial misuse of celebrity images, McConaughey’s federal strategy provides broader enforcement powers.  Critically, it extends beyond direct product sales to encompass AI-generated content mimicking his protected performance markers, regardless of commercial intent. Any AI model replicating these distinctive elements could face federal trade mark infringement claims.

“My team and I want to know that when my voice or likeness is ever used, it's because I approved and signed off on it,” McConaughey explained. “We want to create a clear perimeter around ownership with consent and attribution the norm in an AI world." Although he has not yet faced documented AI misuse, the registrations serve as a proactive deterrent, particularly given recent deepfake incidents involving other celebrities such as Tom Hanks, Oprah Winfrey, and Taylor Swift. 

According to McConaughey’s lawyer, no other actors have secured such comprehensive trade mark protection. In the EU and UK, non-traditional marks, such as those comprising movement or sound, remain relatively rare, likely owing to challenges in registrability and enforceability. However, in 2025, Cole Palmer successfully secured UK[5] and EU registrations[6] for his distinctive “shiver goal celebration”. 

Palmer also obtained a UK trade mark for his facial image.[7] His equivalent EU application, however, remains pending[8] and may be affected by an upcoming Grand Board of Appeal decision on the registrability of facial-image marks in another application[9]

A Look Ahead

More celebrities will likely follow McConaughey’s approach to protect their unique traits. As a result, AI developers will increasingly need to conduct comprehensive searches of trade mark registers to identify any existing registrations, including movement and sound marks, and determine the goods and services classes in which they are protected. 

McConaughey’s comprehensive strategy illustrates how traditional intellectual property frameworks can be adapted to address emerging technological challenges. By securing federal protection for sensory elements of his persona, he has built upon existing approaches to celebrity brand protection and adapted them for the AI era. 

Whether courts will uphold this novel application of trade mark law, however, remains to be seen. Enforcement could prove challenging, particularly regarding how specific movements or phrases can serve as source identifiers, how closely AI-generated outputs may resemble them before being considered infringing and whether or not McConaughy has actually made the required use of the marks. These are questions that will undoubtedly require further consideration. However, in the meantime McConaughey’s forward-thinking broad approach may become a new standard for how public figures safeguard their most valuable asset: themselves. 

While McConaughy does not yet appear to have filed similar applications at the EUIPO, we expect to see applications for International Registrations through WIPO from McConaughey and his team, expanding the global reach of his protection. 

 


[1]Registration Number 7,931,810 USPTO TSDR Case Viewer & Registration Number 7,995,851 USPTO TSDR Case Viewer.

[2]Registration Number 7,893,248 USPTO TSDR Case Viewer & Registration Number 7,995,959 USPTO TSDR Case Viewer.

[3]Registration Number 7,995,951 USPTO TSDR Case Viewer & Registration Number 8,070,191 USPTO TSDR Case Viewer

[4]Registration Number 7,995,852 USPTO TSDR Case Viewer & Registration Number 7,995,858 USPTO TSDR Case Viewer

[5] UK Trade Mark Number UK00004129108 - Search for a trade mark - Intellectual Property Office

[6]EU Trade Mark Number 019120480 - EUIPO - eSearch

[7]UK Trade Mark Number UK00004129121Search for a trade mark - Intellectual Property Office

[8]EU Trade Mark Number 019120537 - EUIPO - eSearch

[9] Case R 50/2024-2, Johannes Hendricus Maria Smit / EUIPO

Latest insights

More Insights
featured image

Time to act - Urgency and Imminent Threat of Infringement before the Unified Patent Court (UPC)

8 minutes Feb 05 2026

Read More
featured image

A question of Admissibility or Jurisdiction? An overview of international positions regarding compliance with agreed pre-arbitration processes

11 minutes Feb 04 2026

Read More
featured image

UK GDPR: UK privacy reform is finally going live – what does your business need to do now?

13 minutes Feb 03 2026

Read More